-
AstorGG
| .
|
|
|
|
Un articolo del New York Times che spiega come si svolgerà l'audizione di domenica per decidere il futuro immediato della Valieva (bisogna aprire un account, anche attraverso FB o Google, per leggerlo):
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/02/12/sp...-hearing-doping
Ne riporto l'ultima parte, che è la più interessante:
"The stakes of its decision for the Olympics and the global fight against doping could not be higher. As a Russian, Valieva is competing for a nation that is not able to compete under its own name or flag as part of a multiyear ban related to a state-led doping scheme that sought to corrupt results at the 2014 Sochi Olympics.
But none of that will be part of Sunday’s discussion. There also will be little discussion about how the banned heart medication, trimetazidine, ended up in Valieva’s system, or why it took more than six weeks for the results of a test submitted in December to be confirmed.
Instead, Sunday’s hearing will focus on process and proportionality, with the arbitrators asked to weigh a largely philosophical argument pitting the damage of enforcing an immediate ban on a 15-year-old girl — and blocking her from the biggest competition of her life — against the potential damage to the integrity of the competition if she is allowed to compete.
As a minor, Valieva enjoys a different status to older athletes, meaning any punishment that may eventually be meted out to her is likely to be lower than typically issued for a similar failed test. But that is a conversation for another day, and for another hearing that is likely to be months away."
Messa così, ovvero se veramente non si parlerà della realtà o meno del doping della Valieva, ovvero il referto non sarà considerato già come prova accertata di doping, ma solo della "giustezza" di penalizzarla immediatamente oppure no, credo che la russa abbia buone possibilità di poter gareggiare martedi.
|
|
|
| .
|
550 replies since 9/2/2022, 09:05 15744 views
.
.
.
